Devareaux
Active Member
Devareaux, you show an enormous knowledge of physics, but you are having a problem accepting common basic discussion of fact pertaining to bullet strength and integrity. Please take your discussion to another forum.
Stonecreek. Would you please shut down this thread because it has become a pissing contest that no longer serves any good purpose on this forum.
To all of you who have contributed to this discussion while it was still of value to those who hand load for the best results of ALL phases of shooting, thank you for your input. Sakojim.
I have posted the World Congress of Engineering paper, I also posted the Hornady Study, I also posted the study that Erik did at Berger Bullets about everything I have brought to the thread. But no one is quoting those links, because they aren't here to discuss bullet integrity, they are here to simply be argumentative. This is the general discussion forum, which is the proper place to generally discuss Sako related information, and if Bullet Integrity isn't related to a Sako owner and his firearm, I don't know what is.
This isn't a pissing contest or a thread about physics, no one cares who knows more about physics, I'm sure there are engineers here that would put everyone to shame about their knowledge of physics. This is a thread about bullet integrity and posting information regarding this, you don't have to know physics to do this, just be a participant. And I've had multiple people show up to my thread only to protest the fact that I'm posting in the first place on a matter they wish not be on the forums, ,well too bad so sad, they aren't the thread Gestapo and I won't be disrespected by authoritarians. Sounds pretty Anti- Free speech to me. I actually expected better behavior from the members here at SCC.
(https://forum.accurateshooter.com/threads/berger-bullet-failure-test.2481280/)
Proceedings of the 'World Congress of Engineering'"(http://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCE2010/WCE2010_pp1444-1447.pdf)
(https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015/10/29/hornadys-big-announcement-eld-x-heat-shield-tip/)
(https://kestrelmeters.com/pages/g1-g7-ballistic-coefficients-what-s-the-difference)
"The SR-71 would get blisteringly hot. This was not due to “friction” with the air as is often claimed, but due to compression of the air. In effect, the SR-71 was a bloody great hammer smashing air molecules; since it was moving three times the speed of sound, the molecules simply could not flow out of the way and instead were compressed to many times normal density and shoved out of the way. The compression occurred quickly enough that the heat built up in the process could not radiate away, and instead was conducted to the skin of the plane.
Interestingly, the hottest part of the plane – apart from the engines – was the one part that the engineers and pilots most wanted to keep cool: the cockpit."